public-grddl-comments@w3.org from April to June 2007 by date

Saturday, 30 June 2007

• Re: Raptor 1.4.16-pre testing with GRDDL Test Cases Dave Beckett

Thursday, 28 June 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Monday, 25 June 2007

• Re: Comments on GRDDL (using 3rd-party XML schemas with GRDDL) [OK?] Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on GRDDL (using 3rd-party XML schemas with GRDDL) [OK?] Andrew Eisenberg
• Re: Comments on GRDDL (transformation failure case) Andrew Eisenberg

Sunday, 24 June 2007

• Re: Comments on GRDDL [OK?] Harry Halpin

Thursday, 21 June 2007

• Re: Raptor 1.4.16-pre testing with GRDDL Test Cases [OK?] Jeremy Carroll
• Please review new base appendix of GRDDL spec Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 20 June 2007

• Re: Some comments re: microformats Ryan King
• Re: Some comments re: microformats Harry Halpin

Tuesday, 19 June 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-10: Does an XML namespace necessarily imply semantics? Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: issue-dbooth-10: Does an XML namespace necessarily imply semantics? Harry Halpin
• RE: issue-dbooth-4f: Sec 4, base IRI of an element [closed] Dan Connolly
• Re: Minor editorial issue: variable defined but not used [OK?] Dan Connolly

Monday, 18 June 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-9a: GRDDL should be usable in a messaging pipeline [CLOSED] Dan Connolly

Friday, 15 June 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-9a: GRDDL should be usable in a messaging pipeline [OK?] Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• RE: issue-dbooth-9a: GRDDL should be usable in a messaging pipeline Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• RE: issue-dbooth-4f: Sec 4, base IRI of an element Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Wednesday, 13 June 2007

• RE: Raptor 1.4.16-pre testing with GRDDL Test Cases Clark, John
• Re: Raptor 1.4.16-pre testing with GRDDL Test Cases Chimezie Ogbuji
• RE: Raptor 1.4.16-pre testing with GRDDL Test Cases Clark, John
• Raptor 1.4.16-pre testing with GRDDL Test Cases Dave Beckett

Tuesday, 12 June 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-4f: Sec 4, base IRI of an element Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• issue-dbooth-4f: Sec 4, base IRI of an element Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• RE: issue-dbooth-9c: Base URI should only be required if needed [OK?] Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: issue-dbooth-9c: Base URI should only be required if needed [OK?] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: issue-dbooth-9a: GRDDL should be usable in a messaging pipeline Jeremy Carroll
• Re: issue-dbooth-9a: GRDDL should be usable in a messaging pipeline [OK?] Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 5 June 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-9c: Base URI should only be required if needed Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: base-uri and XSLT 1.0 [OK?] Dave Beckett

Monday, 4 June 2007

• Re: base-uri and XSLT 1.0 [OK?] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comments on GRDDL (transformation failure case) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A [NOT A FORMAL COMMENT] Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 31 May 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Wednesday, 30 May 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-9c: Base URI should only be required if needed Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results (#issue-faithful-infoset ) Harry Halpin
• Re: issue-dbooth-9c: Base URI should only be required if needed Dan Connolly
• Re: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results Dan Connolly
• Re: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results (#issue-faithful-infoset ) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Tuesday, 29 May 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-10: Does an XML namespace necessarily imply semantics? Harry Halpin
• RE: issue-dbooth-10: Does an XML namespace necessarily imply semantics? Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results (#issue-faithful-infoset ) Dan Connolly
• Re: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results Harry Halpin
• issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Saturday, 26 May 2007

• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A Keith Alexander
• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A Ben Adida

Friday, 25 May 2007

• RE: issue-dbooth-10: Does an XML namespace necessarily imply semantics? Harry Halpin
• issue-dbooth-9c: Base URI should only be required if needed Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• RE: issue-dbooth-10: Does an XML namespace necessarily imply semantics? Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• issue-dbooth-10: Does an XML namespace necessarily imply semantics? Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: base-uri and XSLT 1.0 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comments on GRDDL (transformation failure case) Jeremy Carroll
• issue-dbooth-9a: GRDDL should be usable in a messaging pipeline Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Thursday, 24 May 2007

• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A Elias Torres
• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
• RE: GRDDL profile for RDF-A Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 23 May 2007

• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A Keith Alexander
• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A Elias Torres
• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A Elias Torres
• GRDDL profile for RDF-A José Manuel Cantera Fonseca

Thursday, 17 May 2007

• Re: GRDDL Spec is not neutral with respect to the mechanism used to extract RDF [CLOSED] Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 16 May 2007

• Re: GRDDL Spec is not neutral with respect to the mechanism used to extract RDF José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
• Re: GRDDL Spec is not neutral with respect to the mechanism used to extract RDF Dan Connolly
• Re: Some comments re: microformats [OK?] Dan Connolly

Friday, 11 May 2007

• GRDDL Spec is not neutral with respect to the mechanism used to extract RDF José Manuel Cantera Fonseca

Thursday, 10 May 2007

• Some comments re: microformats Ryan King
• Minor editorial issue: variable defined but not used Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Saturday, 5 May 2007

• base-uri and XSLT 1.0 Dave Beckett

Wednesday, 2 May 2007

• Re: Comments on GRDDL (transformation failure case) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Comments on GRDDL Chimezie Ogbuji
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] (#issue-faithful-infoset, XProc) Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: Comments on GRDDL Andrew Eisenberg
• Re: Comments on GRDDL (transformation failure case) Andrew Eisenberg
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] (#issue-faithful-infoset, XProc) Dan Connolly
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] (#issue-faithful-infoset, XProc) Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Tuesday, 1 May 2007

• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] (#issue-output-formats) Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on GRDDL (using 3rd-party XML schemas with GRDDL) [OK?] Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on GRDDL (transformation failure case) Dan Connolly
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] (#issue-output-formats) Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Monday, 30 April 2007

• Re: Comments on GRDDL Dan Connolly
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] (#issue-faithful-infoset, XProc) Dan Connolly
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] (#issue-output-formats) Dan Connolly
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: GRDDL and SWD Diego Berrueta
• Re: another GRDDL spec review Diego Berrueta
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• RE: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Saturday, 28 April 2007

• Comments on GRDDL Andrew Eisenberg

Friday, 27 April 2007

• Re: Comments on GRDDL draft [OK?] Dan Connolly
• Comments on GRDDL draft Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 Dave Beckett
• Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 (namespac document) Dave Beckett
• Re: EARL output for Raptor 1.4.15 tests with 2007-03-28 WD Dave Beckett

Thursday, 26 April 2007

• Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: another GRDDL spec review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: GRDDL and SWD Jeremy Carroll
• Re: GRDDL and SWD Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 (namespac document) Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 25 April 2007

• Re: EARL output for Raptor 1.4.15 tests with 2007-03-28 WD Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Javascript and GRDDL [#issue-whichlangs] Stefano Mazzocchi
• another GRDDL spec review Diego Berrueta
• GRDDL and SWD Diego Berrueta
• Re: Javascript and GRDDL [#issue-whichlangs] Harry Halpin

Tuesday, 24 April 2007

• Re: EARL output for Raptor 1.4.15 tests with 2007-03-28 WD Dave Beckett
• EARL output for Raptor 1.4.15 tests with 2007-03-28 WD Dave Beckett

Monday, 23 April 2007

• [CLOSED] Re: editorial informal comments on editor's draft Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 10 April 2007

• Raptor 1.4.15 testing with GRDDL Tests Cases W3C Working Draft 28th March 2007 Dave Beckett

Monday, 9 April 2007

• Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 (whitespace) Dave Beckett
• Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 (namespac document) Dave Beckett

Friday, 6 April 2007

• Re: editorial informal comments on editor's draft Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 (whitespace) Dan Connolly

Thursday, 5 April 2007

• Re: editorial informal comments on editor's draft Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 4 April 2007

• Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 (namespac document) Dan Connolly
• Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007 Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF Model vs Serialization (Language) [OK?] Dan Connolly

Sunday, 1 April 2007

• Re: Javascript and GRDDL [#issue-whichlangs] Stefano Mazzocchi
• Re: Javascript and GRDDL [#issue-whichlangs] Chimezie Ogbuji

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2007 04:03:26 UTC