- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:44:54 -0500
- To: "Danny Ayers" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, "Chimezie Ogbuji" <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>, www-archive@w3.org
I didn't see this finding mentioned anywhere, but it seems to me to be germane to most of the issues brought up in this discussion; http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect Mark. On 11/2/06, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 02/11/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > we figure they're statements. Details attached. > > > Nov 02 12:20:23 <DanC> because in some sense, when you fire up an RDF > tool, you the consumer are saying "never mind what the author told the web; > I'm willing to take the risk that he meant RDF" > > This seems reasonable to a (distinct) point. Local interpretation of the > material is fine, republication of the material is troublesome. With "never > mind...", any provenance chain is broken. > > Cheers, > Danny. > > > > -- > > http://dannyayers.com
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:45:16 UTC