Re: Protocol for suggested changes to WebGPU spec

That looks good to me.  Thanks for driving this clarification.
thanks
david

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:26 PM Greg Roth <Gregory.Roth@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Hello WebGPUvians!
>
>
>
> In discussion with @Dan Sinclair <dsinclair@google.com> and @Myles C.
> Maxfield <mmaxfield@apple.com>, we’ve agreed on a protocol for organizing
> the flow of changes to the WebGPU spec going forward that will hopefully
> standardize the editing procedure in a way that satisfies everyone.
>
>
>
> A proposed change that is either considered to be noncontroversial or has
> already been agreed upon by the group should begin as a pull request to the
> GitHub repository: https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb Where it will require
> approval from an editor. If the pull request is initiated by an editor,
> another will still have to review it. That is not to say that other
> feedback on pull requests is unwelcome. Discussions can play out over these
> as they have previously.
>
>
>
> If the reviewer agrees that the pull request is uncontroversial or matches
> what has already been agreed upon, an editor can approve and merge it. To
> make sure this is conducted properly, interested parties are invited to
> “watch” the gpuweb repository and monitor the changes there. If something
> is approved as uncontroversial or resolved seems incorrect, the issue can
> be brought up and discussed with the larger group if needed. If necessary,
> merged changes can be reverted or altered if its determined they were in
> error.
>
>
>
> If there are no objections, this text will be added to
> https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/blob/master/wgsl/README.md
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgpuweb%2Fgpuweb%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fwgsl%2FREADME.md&data=02%7C01%7CGregory.Roth%40microsoft.com%7C348cabc5531a4dc1409308d7db0bb015%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637218715564104075&sdata=xiptdP5RuZO7IbRz6Ay%2BmS1%2BL5Kt6b2hR9sZDedJdfM%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>