W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gpu@w3.org > August 2019

Re: Shading Languages Discussion Date

From: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@google.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 20:35:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGdfWNPOwsupUtVhYTsOaOcectD=EbsUrficD5pAstPq5K6dcg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Myles C. Maxfield" <mmaxfield@apple.com>
Cc: public-gpu <public-gpu@w3.org>
Hey Myles,

While everyone is very welcome to attend the shading language meeting, I'm
not sure I get the rational for postponing for Maciej and Theresa. I
understand they have busy calendars but they haven't participated actively
in this group for at least a year / a year and a half, and as far as I know
they don't have a particular expertise about shading language (for example
compared to someone like Chas).

That said we should definitely have a discussion about shading language at
the F2F, realistically I don't see us reaching a final decision on August
19th. Let's at least present status updates and list all important use
cases on August 19th and see what we'll do with the extra time (of course
the agenda is open if you have a better idea).

Cheers,

Corentin

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:47 PM Myles C. Maxfield <mmaxfield@apple.com>
wrote:

> Hi!
>
> It turns out that neither Maciej nor Tess are available on August 19 (and
> I think August 26 too, though I’m not sure), and I’m unavailable for the
> entire month of September until the face-to-face. We're thinking that it
> makes more sense to have the discussion during our upcoming face-to-face in
> New Orleans. Both Maciej and Tess will be available on that date and would
> like to attend, possibly via videoconferencing, and possibly in-person.
>
> Sorry we didn’t realize this scheduling conflict sooner. We promise we’re
> not stalling. Even ignoring schedules, having this kind of discussion
> in-person would likely result in higher-quality discussion.
>
> Thanks,
> Myles
>
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2019 18:36:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:26 UTC