Re: Is there an ISO 8601 based alternative to accrualPeriodicity in DCAT?

So are you saying an 8601 formatted recurring date would fit within the
range of dctype:Frequency but only if it didn't include a start or end date?

The requirement is both to express other frequencies than cld:Frequency as
well as more precise times.


On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
wrote:

> Hi Philip,
>
> On 9 Jun 2014, at 23:22, Philip Ashlock - XI <philip.ashlock@gsa.gov>
> wrote:
>
> > As far as I can tell accrualPeriodicity is limited to the predefined
> terms for frequency http://dublincore.org/groups/collections/frequency/
>
> I don’t think that’s the case. The range of dcterms:accrualPeriodicity is
> dctype:Frequency. It doesn’t follow that values are limited to
> cld:Frequency.
>
> (However, I do agree that a recurring interval with a start date is out of
> range for dctype:Frequency.)
>
> > Are there any existing terms that could be used in place of
> accrualPeriodicity using 8601 recurring interval syntax for more
> flexibility?
>
> I’m not aware of anything suitable.
>
> What is the requirement here? Express other frequencies besides those in
> cld:Frequency? Or express the precise time (e.g., not just monthly, but
> monthly on the 10th)?
>
> Best,
> Richard




-- 
Philip Ashlock
Chief Architect, Data.gov
U.S. General Services Administration