- From: Alexander Dutton <alexander.dutton@it.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:46:23 +0000
- To: public-gld-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <527A563F.6060408@it.ox.ac.uk>
[A variant of this message has already been sent to Dave off-list, but here's a copy he can link to for the record] Hi Dave et al, We're using the ORG ontology for the University of Oxford's IT Services internal org chart and the University's OxPoints dataset. The frontend to our orgchart is a pure JS web app doing SPARQL against an OAuth2-protected endpoint. It's in GitHub at <https://github.com/ox-it/orgchart>. Unfortunately the data are not public, but if you want I should be able to generate an anonymised version which I could send your way. Of particular note is <https://github.com/ox-it/orgchart/blob/master/index.html>, which has a few SPARQL queries in it, and which should show you which bits of the ontology we're using. We are using org:Role to represent job titles, and org:roleProperty to differentiate between roles that are management and those that are not. We're also using org:basedAt to record the link between a org:Post and a geo:SpatialThing — I realise that the spec says the domain should be foaf:Person, but some of our people have multiple posts based in different buildings. Likewise, we're using org:reportsTo between org:Posts, not people. OxPoints (our organisational/spatial dataset) is using org:has[Primary]Site. We're using v:adr on places directly, instead of org:siteAddress pointing at a v:VCard. I *thought* we were using org:OrganizationalCollaboration for admissionsℹ (http://www.ox.ac.uk/admissions/admissions_i/), so I guess that that counts as planned usage for now. There are also a few other things like collaborative research centres that could be modelled this way. It would be nice if we used org:ChangeEvent et al, but I think we'd need a class for "defunct organization" so we didn't confuse tools looking for organizations. Sub-properties of org:linkedTo would also come in handy for modelling the relationship between the University and its constituent colleges, spin-outs, Recognised Independent Centres, and Ripon College Cuddesdon (which isn't a college or hall of the University, but which has degrees validated by it). I just haven't got this far yet. If at some point the University decides to expose its list of student clubs and societies, org:purpose would be a good fit for the bit on the club registration form called "Aims or purpose of Club". Hope this helps! Best regards, Alex On 04/11/13 15:21, Dave Reynolds wrote: > The W3C GLD working group is discussing the status of the Organization > Ontology [1] which is currently a Candidate Recommendation. > > While there is evidence of usage [2] we cannot yet meet the CR exit > criteria for all the terms in the ontology. The group will need to > decide within the next two weeks what to do about this (options > include alternative publication tracks). > > If you have, or are planning, a use of the ORG ontology and have not > yet reported it to the working group then please could you do so over > the next two weeks letting us know at least which terms you have used. > If you plan a report but cannot make that timescale then please > contact us. > > Dave > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Implementations > -- Alexander Dutton Linked Open Data Architect, Office of the CIO; data.ox.ac.uk, OxPoints IT Services, University of Oxford
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 22:29:18 UTC