- From: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:41:20 -0400
- To: Alasdair Gray <alasdair.gray@manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-gld-comments@w3.org
Hi Alasdair! RE the dcat:mediaType issue, I think this applies to many properties that typically will have literal values (e.g. "audio/BV16"), but in some cases might have URI values (e.g. http://purl.org/NET/mediatypes/audio/BV16 ). DCAT shares this with esp. Dublin Core. For a good discussion of how DC accommodates this see e.g. "Representing DCAM constructs using the RDF Model" <http://www.dublincore.org/documents/dc-rdf/#sect-4> John On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Alasdair Gray <alasdair.gray@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious as to how dcat:mediaType should be used within a description. > > There is a single example in the DCAT document that has a literal as the > value. Is there a list of all the valid values? WIll this be pointed to by > the document? > > Have you thought about pointing to a URI instead of a literal? For example > using something like > http://purl.org/NET/mediatypes > > Also, what is considered good practice when the dataset files have been > zipped? Should the content type be captured as something like > 'Application/gzip' or should it still be the underlying data format, e.g. > 'text/turtle'? How then should the fact that it is compressed be captured. > In an http header this would be captured with a separate field > Content-Encoding. > > Thanks, > > Alasdair -- John S. Erickson, Ph.D. Director, Web Science Operations Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> Twitter & Skype: olyerickson
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 15:41:52 UTC