- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:49:23 +0100
- To: public-gld-comments@w3.org
On 06/04/13 18:13, Raphaël Troncy wrote: > Dear Richard, > >> Multiple popular vocabularies that use this practice have been listed >> in the thread. > > I have seen those. I still think this is rather anecdotal in comparison > to the very large set of properties that has a hasXXX OR a isXXXBy that > one can found in the wild. Doing a quick search on LOV confirms me this. The primary arguments I have heard in favour of hasXXX/isXXXBy are about disambiguating the *direction* of the property. Not differentiating the property from nearby class names. For example I *still* have to consult the spec to remember which way round skos:broader goes whereas long winded skos:isBroaderThan or skos:hasBroaderConcept would be much clearer. However, that is not the case here. I don't think there is any serious concern about dcat:dataset being directionally ambiguous. Dave
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2013 17:49:53 UTC