- From: Christopher Gutteridge <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:21:28 +0100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- CC: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>, Makx Dekkers <makx@makxdekkers.com>, "'Bill Roberts'" <bill@swirrl.com>, public-gld-comments@w3.org
I would prefer to see dcat:hasDataset and dcat:hasDistribution it's less likely to cause errors, especially as the rdfs:label is identical too. On 05/04/13 17:13, Raphaël Troncy wrote: > Dear all, > >> I followed the idea of using a property to point to a class with the >> capitalisation of the class name as the only difference in some recent >> vocab work - and got push back. > > I would also recommend to push back on this, and disagree with Bill, > this is not an established practice (or at least, I would like to see > evidence of the contrary), nor a practice to encourage. > >> I was told by non-Sem Web data modellers >> that the more general convention is that properties (data type >> properties) should be nouns and relationships (object type properties) >> should be verbs. >> >> Things like org:hasSite cf. org:classification fit in with this. > > Yes, and remember that we are talking about directed graph, and that a > good practice is to give the direction of the property in its name, > thus the hasXXX or the isXXXOf pattern. > >> Based on that, if we were starting from scratch I'd argue for >> dcat:hasDataset or dcat:includesDataset but it may be too late now. > > Why would it be too late? This is last Call. So this is the time. > After, rec, this would be too late. > Best regards. > > Raphaël > -- Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/ You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/ Would you recommend the software you use to another institution? http://uni-software.ideascale.com/
Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 16:21:58 UTC