- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:29:30 +0100
- To: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
- CC: "public-gld-comments@w3.org" <public-gld-comments@w3.org>
Thanks Bill, On the address issue - the range of siteAddress has been removed so that use of VCard is no longer mandatory. See [1]. An important driver for this is interop with INSPIRE where house numbers/names and units within them, e.g. Flat 3, 15 Acacia Avenue, would be recorded in three fields [Flat 3] [15] [Acacia Avenue] which is at least one more field than VCard would use. Phil. [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_LC_comments#Align_treatment_of_registered_addresses_with_RegOrg_.5BDone.5D On 05/04/2013 09:59, Bill Roberts wrote: > I don't have any significant comments on the contents of the Organization ontology document, but would like to note that I have found it useful on a number of occasions. I would definitely support this becoming a W3C recommendation. > > I would only note in passing that vCard remains a bit of a nightmare to use in practice and if a simpler way of representing addresses could be found it would make me and many others happy. But that's not the fault of the organization ontology. > > > > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 09:30:08 UTC