provenance ontology in the Organization Ontology from Paul Groth on 2012-10-03 (public-gld-comments@w3.org from October 2012)

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 17:15:48 +0200
To: team-gld-chairs@w3.org, public-gld-comments@w3.org
Cc: team-prov-chairs@w3.org
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRqTD8jpYDs+cxdVG2wK3C0NEOKhoWr1pC5avpUkNTvS_A@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

I was just reading the Organization Ontology [1]. Good job on a nice
and useful ontology.

I did however have a comment. Currently, you subclass OPMV for your
provenance ontology. Given that the W3C is producing a recommended
provenance ontology PROV-O [2] (now in last call). I was wondering if
you could consider moving to prov or is there a reason to stick with
OPMV?

Thanks
Paul

co-chair W3C Provenance Working Group


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vocab-org-20120405/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/



--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam

Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 15:16:19 UTC