- From: Thomas Bandholtz <thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:52:09 +0200
- To: public-gld-comments@w3.org
Oh Dave, Am 20.07.2012 14:33, schrieb Dave Reynolds: > Like I say, there is nothing to stop you attaching the UoM to the > MeasureProperty itself. > > While that's not listed as an explicit qb:Attachable there's nothing > to prevent you doing that. To my understanding this wouldn't make any difference. The range of qb:componentAttachment is rdfs:Class, I would need multiple UoM components, each of them attached to a different *instance* of qb:MeasureProperty. It's like describing life expectancy and hat size in a single qb:Observation instance, each of them with a distinct UoM ;-) I guess no consuming application would get along with that - or am I too OO? Best, Thomas -- Thomas Bandholtz Principal Consultant innoQ Deutschland GmbH Krischerstr. 100, D-40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany http://www.innoq.com thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com +49 178 4049387 http://innoq.com/de/themen/linked-data (German) https://github.com/innoq/iqvoc/wiki/Linked-Data (English)
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 12:52:28 UTC