- From: Thomas Bandholtz <thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:47:38 +0200
- To: public-gld-comments@w3.org
Hi Dave, quite a nested structure of schema snippets, but that's fine as it works. I finally came to http://environment.data.gov.uk/def/bathing-water-quality/sampleDsd, and here I sadly find a qb:DataStructureDefinition which holds a lot of empty components only, like this: qb:component [] ; The definition of those components would have been the most interesting thing for me right now. Obviously you left that out? Best regards, Thomas Am 18.07.2012 15:18, schrieb Dave Reynolds: > Hi Thomas, > > This is maybe getting off topic for this list but I guess others might > find such deployment examples useful ... > > First, the answer is that there are several ontologies involved in the > Environment Agency data. > > The one you are looking at defines the notion of a BathingWater, > particular types of BathingWater and the associated properties. > > BathingWaters then have associated sampling points where quality > measurements are taken. The ontology for describing those sampling > points is at: > http://location.data.gov.uk/sources/def/SamplingPoint.ttl > > Then the quality measurements themselves are published as Data Cube > DataSets. The DataStructureDefinitions for the cubes and the > definitions for the associated properties (including links to the > relevant legislation) are all in: > http://environment.data.gov.uk/sources/def/bathing-water-quality.ttl > > But how could you find that out yourself? Linked data is supposed to > help you find things like definitions after all. > > Let's start from one of the end user applications: > http://environment.data.gov.uk/lab/bwq-web.html > > Then pick or search for a place, I chose "Crantock" Bay: > http://environment.data.gov.uk/lab/bwq-info.html?_search=cran&site=ukk3106-32100 > > > Now you can see there a table of latest annual and in-season values > (plus links to a page of more detailed graphs and tables). At the > moment the latest in-season value is showing as being from "13 Jul > 2012 13:15:00". If you hover over that date you'll an RDF icon appear > showing that you can click on it to get to the data sample for that > place at that date time: > http://environment.data.gov.uk/data/bathing-water-quality/in-season/sample/point/32100/date/20120713/time/131500/recordDate/20120713 > > > Now we are in the RDF world and can click around the data itself to > see how it is structured. From the type field you can see that you are > looking at a Data Cube observation. You can also see links to the cube > it is in (dataset), to the Bathing Water (bwq_bathing water) being > assessed and the associated sample point (bwq_sampling point) where > the samples were taken, plus all the quality measurements. > > Now to see the definitions of those measurements you can again just > click on them. For example, picking the first property on the page > takes you to: > http://environment.data.gov.uk/def/bathing-water-quality/abnormalWeatherException > > > Which then shows you both the ontology entry and the isDefinedBy link > which you can click on to get you to the complete vocabulary: > http://environment.data.gov.uk/sources/def/bathing-water-quality.ttl > > So this "data you can click on" notion really does work :) > > As it happens there is also human readable documentation on the data > model and the associated API linked off the home page: > http://environment.data.gov.uk/lab/doc/api-bwq-reference-v0.2.html > > Cheers, > Dave > > On 18/07/12 13:26, Thomas Bandholtz wrote: >> ok, Dave, I am getting used to it. >> But, looking though >> http://environment.data.gov.uk/sources/def/bathing-water.ttl >> I find no link to http://purl.org/linked-data/cube# >> How is that done? >> >> Best, >> Thomas >> >> Am 18.07.2012 12:23, schrieb Dave Reynolds: >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> As far as I can tell it is all published correctly but if there's any >>> problems we can get them fixed. >>> >>> def-bw is a prefix bound to the URI : >>> http://environment.data.gov.uk/def/bathing-water/ >>> >>> If I point a browser at: >>> >>> http://environment.data.gov.uk/def/bathing-water/sedimentTypesPresent >>> >>> I get to a definition of sedimentTypesPresent. >>> >>> That has an rdfs:isDefinedBy link to: >>> >>> http://environment.data.gov.uk/sources/def/bathing-water.ttl >>> >>> Which includes the definition. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> On 18/07/12 10:52, Thomas Bandholtz wrote: >>>> Hi John, >>>> >>>> I wasn't aware this was Data Cubes. >>>> >>>> I wonder about your cube model in RDF. >>>> F.e. I see a property def-bw:sedimentTypesPresent, but looking up this >>>> namespace (def-bw:) I do not find anything about sedimentTypesPresent. >>>> Am I blind? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Thomas >>>> >>>> Am 18.07.2012 11:03, schrieb John Goodwin: >>>>> Hi Thomas, >>>>> >>>>> I take it you have seen the work from the Environment Agency of >>>>> England >>>>> & Wales? >>>>> >>>>> http://environment.data.gov.uk/lab/ >>>>> >>>>> they use the data cube ontology. >>>>> >>>>> A write up here: >>>>> >>>>> http://data.gov.uk/blog/bathing-water-quality-as-linked-data >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> Dr John Goodwin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Senior Research Scientist >>>>> Research, Ordnance Survey >>>>> Adanac Drive, SOUTHAMPTON, United Kingdom, SO16 0AS >>>>> Phone: +44 (0) 23 8005 5761 >>>>> www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk | john.goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk >>>>> Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing >>>>> this >>>>> email. >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Thomas Bandholtz [mailto:thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com] >>>>>> Sent: 18 July 2012 09:50 >>>>>> To: public-gld-comments@w3.org >>>>>> Subject: Data Cubes RDF Schema >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> we finally have a little R&D project by the Federal Environment >>>>>> Agency >>>>>> to implement Linked Environment Data in Germany. >>>>>> We plan to use Data Cubes as one of several standards. >>>>>> Looking for the RDF Schema I find >>>>>> http://publishing-statistical- >>>>>> data.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/specs/src/main/vocab/cube.[ttl|rdf], >>>>>> last modified 2010-11-27. Is this still valid? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Thomas >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thomas Bandholtz >>>>>> Principal Consultant >>>>>> >>>>>> innoQ Deutschland GmbH >>>>>> Krischerstr. 100, >>>>>> D-40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany >>>>>> http://www.innoq.com >>>>>> thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com >>>>>> +49 178 4049387 >>>>>> >>>>>> http://innoq.com/de/themen/linked-data >>>>>> >>>>> This email is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed >>>>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this >>>>> email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email which >>>>> must not be copied, distributed or disclosed to any other person. >>>>> >>>>> Unless stated otherwise, the contents of this email are personal to >>>>> the writer and do not represent the official view of Ordnance >>>>> Survey. Nor can any contract be formed on Ordnance Survey's behalf >>>>> via email. We reserve the right to monitor emails and attachments >>>>> without prior notice. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for your cooperation. >>>>> >>>>> Ordnance Survey >>>>> Adanac Drive >>>>> Southampton SO16 0AS >>>>> Tel: 08456 050505 >>>>> http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- Thomas Bandholtz Principal Consultant innoQ Deutschland GmbH Krischerstr. 100, D-40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany http://www.innoq.com thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com +49 178 4049387 http://innoq.com/de/themen/linked-data
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 14:47:59 UTC