- From: Maali, Fadi <fadi.maali@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:43:48 +0100
- To: "Simon Reinhardt" <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>, <public-gld-comments@w3.org>
Hi Simon, Thanks for your comments. regarding the DCAT part: > I also see some other potential mappings or opportunities for re-use: dcat:Dataset could > be a sub-class or replaced with void:Dataset [5]. dcat:Dataset can't be a subclass of void:Dataset because it is a more general concept. void:Dataset represents an RDF dataset while dcat:Dataset captures any dataset. Consideration of other possible mappings (e.g. to dcat:Distribution) are also possible see [7] for an initial discussion. Mapping the two vocabularies is definitely worth thinking of however I believe deferring the decsion until dcat is used more in the wild and usecases become clearer is better for now. Regards, Fadi [1] https://plus.google.com/102497386507936526460/posts/Xswyq5GxdvL [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-people/ [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/ [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/void/ [6] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/ [7] http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=63
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 08:44:23 UTC