Re: Geofencing alternative proposal

On 19 September 2014 13:26, Marijn Kruisselbrink <mek@google.com> wrote:
> Oh yes, I'm not saying that registered fences and other properties like that
> won't be maintained. But the actual event handler itself is a closure that
> can potentially hold references to any other bit of javascript state, so to
> maintain event handler bindings in arbitrary objects would mean maintaining
> the full javascript state, which wouldn't be practical.

Nothing I suggested would require that though.  Or have I misunderstood you?

Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 20:33:03 UTC