Hi Marcos, I’ll let Dom or Kaz comment on behalf of the W3C, but I believe the Errata was meant to address discrepancies between V1 of the specification and WebIDL (http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/geoapi-errata.html) – the two specs did not evolve at the same pace. I don’t think we have carte blanche to make wholesale changes to the V1 version of the API, although there are certainly valid concerns with it. -Giri From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 11:40 AM To: Michael van Ouwerkerk; Mandyam, Giridhar Cc: Mounir Lamouri; Dominique Hazael-Massieux; public-geolocation Subject: RE: Geolocation Errata and Updated Working Draft On October 14, 2014 at 11:58:36 AM, Mandyam, Giridhar (mandyam@quicinc.com<mailto:mandyam@quicinc.com>) wrote: > > The original suggestion was not necessarily to fix anything, > but to seek guidance on public-script-coord. Do you have a different > suggestion? Yes. My suggestion is to fix this and other issues with the spec ^_^. There is no reason not to improve the spec in an interoperable way.
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:53:06 UTC