- From: Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@quicinc.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:58:15 +0000
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>
- CC: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
The original suggestion was not necessarily to fix anything, but to seek guidance on public-script-coord. Do you have a different suggestion? -----Original Message----- From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 8:52 AM To: Michael van Ouwerkerk; Mandyam, Giridhar Cc: Mounir Lamouri; public-geolocation; Dominique Hazael-Massieux Subject: RE: Geolocation Errata and Updated Working Draft On October 10, 2014 at 11:56:23 PM, Mandyam, Giridhar (mandyam@quicinc.com) wrote: > > Mounir, do you still think we need to discuss the use of [NoInterfaceObject] > in the Geo V1 spec, or are you willing to approve? FWIW, I also think we should fix this. Is it ok if we move the spec to GitHub so we can fix it?
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:59:03 UTC