- From: Steve Block <steveblock@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:08:57 +0000
- To: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
> shouldn't RotationRate be named AngularVelocity One reason for this choice of name is that an angular velocity is usually expressed as a cartesian vector describing the axis of rotation. What we have is not really a vector but a set of rates of change of the orientation angles. In any case, it sounds like we're happy to stick with the current name and units. Steve -- Google UK Limited Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 08:09:23 UTC