- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:10:45 +0200
- To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Wojciech Masłowski <wmaslowski@opera.com>
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:58:46 +0200, Wojciech Masłowski <wmaslowski@opera.com> wrote: > Theoretically yes. In practice I don't think this is a problem. Unless > your application does something like counting how many times the > orientation event fired this shouldn't really change the way your > application works. Note that significant change is vague enough so that > the applications should not make any assumptions about timing at which > they receive event therefore it is reasonable to assume that receiving > one additional event should not cause the application to behave any > different. Theoretically yes. In practice one implementation (lets say the market leader) will fire the event when the listener is registered and everyone will be required to follow. Wishy-washy requirements do not work on the web. If you want interoperability implementations will have to do the same, pretty much always. Aside from that, I do not think this group should change the semantics of addEventListener(). If you want to change the semantics of addEventListener(), please bring it up on www-dom@w3.org. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 15:11:15 UTC