Re: Should clearWatch throw an exception?

Ok, that makes sense. Thank you all for the clarification.

On 9/30/10 8:59 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
> This seems like the right behavior -- the desired end state after the
> call is that a watch does not exist. So if there's no watch to start
> with, it's not an error condition, but a trivial success.
> --Richard
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Steve Block wrote:
>
>> Hi Marcos,
>>
>> I think that the spec intends that an implementation should not throw
>> an exception in this case.
>>
>> This is what WebKit does.
>>
>> Steve
>> --
>> Google UK Limited
>> Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London
>> SW1W 9TQ
>> Registered in England Number: 3977902
>>
>
>

-- 
Marcos Caceres
Opera Software

Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 21:38:08 UTC