- From: Thomson, Martin <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:50:21 +0800
- To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>, Doug Turner <dougt@dougt.org>
- CC: "public-geolocation@w3.org Group WG" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On 2010-11-18 at 18:22:24, Richard L. Barnes wrote: > > Any case, this conversation is interesting... but out of scope, i > think. > > I think you're mostly right. I also kind of agree with Nick, that if > we > could have some sort of basic taxonomy (network vs. device-only) that > pages can use to choose it could be helpful in managing privacy. But > even then it would be a "weakest-link" situation, since even if one > page does something good, other pages might not. Exploring what is and isn't in scope isn't out of scope, I think :) I'd prefer to have that sort of control on the browser - it's the user's agent (natch) in all of this. There is the usual usability concern though. --Martin
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 21:51:28 UTC