- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:27:01 +0200
- To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Andrei Popescu" <andreip@google.com>
- Cc: "Greg Bolsinga" <bolsinga@apple.com>, "Doug Turner" <doug.turner@gmail.com>, "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Wed, 27 May 2009 16:26:57 +0200, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > On 27 May 2009, at 16:15, Andrei Popescu wrote: >> For clarity, I would propose avoiding RFC2119 keywords in this >> section. We could instead say: > > I'm not particularly happy with that step, in particular since the > section is already clearly labelled as non-normative, and since the > phrase in question puts a burden on implementors -- instead of listing a > requirement that implementations should conform to. Please, no RFC 2119 terminology in non-normative prose. That is very confusing. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:27:57 UTC