- From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:16:06 -0700
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Rigo, heh. funny noises. true enough. just feels that we have been discussing the same thing for 8 months -- well before the face to face in December. I hope you understand my frustration at not being able to make a decision. :-) Also, I hope you understand that the post sounds like the starting point of a discussion that Mitchell is having about data. I do not think it would be prudent to draw the line between a framework to discuss data and "we must have privacy rules associated with geolocation". Doug On Jun 18, 2009, at 3:47 AM, Rigo Wenning wrote: > Doug, > > just for the record: What I suggest is absolutely in line with > http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/07/21/framework-for-discussing- > data/ > > For a dead horse, it is making fun noises.. > > Rigo > > On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Doug Turner wrote: >> We are beating a dead horse. From the vote a bit ago, it sounds >> like no UA is going to implement this sort of meta data along >> with the position information. > >
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 15:17:46 UTC