- From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:03:26 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Greg Bolsinga" <bolsinga@apple.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Jun 12, 2009, at 11:57 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:49:12 +0200, Greg Bolsinga > <bolsinga@apple.com> wrote: >> On Jun 12, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: >>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Richard Barnes wrote: >>>> Given the minimal impact of these changes, and the large possible >>>> benefit, I would like to propose that the changes be incorporated >>>> into >>>> the current draft before last call. >>> >>> Personally, I strongly reject this proposal on the grounds described >>> above >>> -- that this would dramatically damage the trust users have in >>> user >>> agentsand would on the long term lead to a significantly worsened >>> user >>> experience in surfing the Web in terms of privacy and security. >> >> +1. I do not think this should be a part of the Geolocation >> specification. > > Agreed, the outlined approach sounds way too brittle and does not > actually give users control. I appreciate Richard's work and compromise, but I do not think Geopriv is right for the web for the reasons we outlined back in December. +1. I do not think that this should be part of the Geolocation specification. Doug Turner
Received on Friday, 12 June 2009 19:04:21 UTC