W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > June 2009

RE: WebIDL, optional attributes

From: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:22:31 +0200
To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
CC: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FAA1D89C5BAF1142A74AF116630A9F2C2890AF787B@OBEEX01.obe.access-company.com>
>>In this case I bet they all did the right thing :)
I also hope that the implementations are interoperable :).
Anyway, double seems not to be able to contribute to interoperability issues in ES.

Thanks.

Cheers,
Marcin

Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrei Popescu [mailto:andreip@google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:19 PM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: public-geolocation
Subject: Re: WebIDL, optional attributes

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Marcin
Hanclik<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Thanks for the changes.
>
>>>I don't think this is a problem: I haven't seen any implementers
>>>complaining about this. 'double' is pretty clear and maps well to JS's
>>>Number type.
> Yeah, the question is what got implemented ...
> Spec(s) should be fixed first in order to have good implementations.
>

In this case I bet they all did the right thing :)

Thanks,
Andrei

________________________________________

Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda

www.access-company.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 12:23:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:56 UTC