- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:43:26 +0100
- To: Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>
- Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>, public-geolocation@w3.org
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com> wrote: >> It is overdue. >> >> In order for us to proceed to last call we need to close all open issues, of >> which there are currently three: >> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/open >> >> ISSUE-2: Should the Geolocation API include privacy information? >> This should be closed. We have concluded that the API will not include >> privacy information. We should focus on ISSUE-5 instead. >> > > Agreed. > >> ISSUE-3: Exposing civic addresses in the API >> This is for "version 2" of the spec and should not hold up our transition to >> last call for "version 1". >> > > Agreed. > >> ISSUE-5: What should the Recommendation state about security and privacy >> considerations? >> Andrei, could you maybe put your latest draft wording into the editor's >> draft. I think it looks good. >> > > Ok, will ping the list once I'm done. > Done. I have also did some small clarifications to the existing wording based on comments from Allan Thomson (in the "api comments" thread). The diff is here: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/geo/api/spec-source.html.diff?r1=1.49&r2=1.50&f=h Thanks, Andrei
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 13:44:13 UTC