- From: Thomson, Martin <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:48:13 -0600
- To: "Greg Bolsinga" <bolsinga@apple.com>, "Doug Turner" <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-geolocation" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
A perfectly valid approach... and one that offers the least complexity and least chance for accidental security leaks (it's unlikely to be disastrous, but the nature of the information in the lastPosition might tell an app something of what another app is doing). A central implementation might be harder, but might also offer advantages. For instance, if one app asks for "highAccuracy" (ick) and another asks before the first gets its response, only one positioning procedure needs to be invoked. This is a very useful feature that falls into the "caching" clique. Cheers, Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Bolsinga [mailto:bolsinga@apple.com] > Sent: Monday, 17 November 2008 4:42 PM > To: Doug Turner > Cc: Thomson, Martin; public-geolocation > Subject: Re: Drop lastPosition from Geolocation? > > On Nov 17, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Doug Turner wrote: > > > > > fwiw I think the point of this was so that you didn't ahve to wait > > until the callback happened.... so if one web application was using > > geolocaiton, another application could get a quick sync result when > > it first starts up. > > Oh, WebCore isn't currently implemented that way! :) Each page gets a > fresh Geolocation implementation. > > -- Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of this email is prohibited. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [mf2]
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 22:48:54 UTC