Hi Doug,
I’m not saying that they can’t. I am saying that you are forcing location provider implementations to rely on geocoding though. There are a few options, but those are neither universal nor are their terms of use necessarily compatible.
Besides, civic addresses often contain richer and more specific information than a geocoding database can manage. Someone I know is very clear about translation between civic and geodetic: every time you translate, you lose something. If you could guarantee an orthogonal transformation, then that might make more sense.
Cheers,
Martin
From: Doug Turner [mailto:doug.turner@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 14 November 2008 9:17 AM
To: Thomson, Martin
Cc: Andrei Popescu; Richard Barnes; public-geolocation
Subject: Re: Forward/backward compatibility
HI Martin,
Why can't fixed devices convert their civic address to lat/lon?
Regards,
Doug
On Nov 13, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
I am of the opinion that the current approach is likely to have the opposite effect to what is intended - that is, it will reinforce the fragmentation of the "mobile" and "fixed" webs simply because mobile devices will have geodetic, fixed devices will not.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]