- From: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:43:39 -0500
- To: Greg Bolsinga <bolsinga@apple.com>
- Cc: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Hi Greg, On Nov 2, 2008, at 2:28 PM, Greg Bolsinga wrote: > If privacy should become part of the spec, I think it would be best > for it to optionally allow for the the implementor to be able to > provide its own scheme and UI. This will allow implementors to > provide a consistent location privacy experience between native apps > using location services and web pages using location services. > > I can see that if an implementor already has a UI and scheme for > location privacy outside of web pages, and if web pages then have a > completely different style that users would be concerned about their > privacy, and may even ignore the warnings more than they do already. I am a little confused about what you mean here. When you say "scheme and UI," does that mean something other than UI? I agree that the spec should not dictate UI (my last email contained a UI discussion only because there was a specific question about it). But if you're saying that all privacy considerations (including consent) should be optional whether they manifest in a UI or not, that's a different story. Can you clarify? Thanks, Alissa
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 17:44:42 UTC