- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:47:20 -0700
- To: public-geolocation@w3.org
hello. the current draft specifies a position exclusively in terms of geographic lat/long concepts (or alternatively, reverse geocoded address information). while this is of course the most important position concept, i am wondering about other position concepts. specifically, there is ongoing work about URI schemes for geolocation (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mayrhofer-geopriv-geo-uri-00.txt), and while i am not a huge fan of the current draft, i think the idea of representing locations as URIs is a good and obvious one. one scenario: i am traveling and would like to avoid leaving an exact GPS location trail. so i set my mobile device to say that i am in (and this is completely made up) geo:usgs.gov/states/CA and all i am saying with that is that i am in california. privacy-wise, this lets me choose how much i want to disclose, and it still allows me to get localized results. i don't want to engage in detailed discussions around how such a scheme could or should be designed, who is responsible for managing the "namespaces", and how all of that would fit into a more location-aware web (or at least that should go into a different thread). but i would be interested in feedback about that scenario, and how exactly this idea of "privacy-friendly locations" could be supported. oh, my concrete comment: the position definition should also support a URI as a datatype. cheers, erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814 dret@berkeley.edu - http://dret.net/netdret UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
Received on Sunday, 22 June 2008 01:48:14 UTC