- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:47:20 -0700
- To: public-geolocation@w3.org
hello.
the current draft specifies a position exclusively in terms of
geographic lat/long concepts (or alternatively, reverse geocoded address
information). while this is of course the most important position
concept, i am wondering about other position concepts. specifically,
there is ongoing work about URI schemes for geolocation
(http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mayrhofer-geopriv-geo-uri-00.txt), and
while i am not a huge fan of the current draft, i think the idea of
representing locations as URIs is a good and obvious one.
one scenario: i am traveling and would like to avoid leaving an exact
GPS location trail. so i set my mobile device to say that i am in (and
this is completely made up) geo:usgs.gov/states/CA and all i am saying
with that is that i am in california. privacy-wise, this lets me choose
how much i want to disclose, and it still allows me to get localized
results.
i don't want to engage in detailed discussions around how such a scheme
could or should be designed, who is responsible for managing the
"namespaces", and how all of that would fit into a more location-aware
web (or at least that should go into a different thread). but i would be
interested in feedback about that scenario, and how exactly this idea of
"privacy-friendly locations" could be supported.
oh, my concrete comment: the position definition should also support a
URI as a datatype.
cheers,
erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814
dret@berkeley.edu - http://dret.net/netdret
UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
Received on Sunday, 22 June 2008 01:48:14 UTC