Re: Semantic Sensor Network Vocabulary

On 2014-11-04 6:45, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:

[snip]
> I hope this contribution can be considered as input to the Sensor Ontology activity within the Spatial Data on the Web working group.

I hope so too! I have just looked at the ontologies and the paper and 
now I am bursting with questions. It's a pity the WG has not started 
yet. To me it looks like a very meaningful contribution and just the 
sort of work that should be discussed and experimented with in the new 
Working Group.

Well, the charter does speak only of further developing the SSN 
vocabulary, but one mentioned direction of development is splitting the 
ontology up in smaller, simpler sections. I can imagine that at least 
some of those sections will be inspired by om-lite and sam-lite, and be 
less burdened by complex imported models.

I also see a strong relationship with the general question of the best 
way to model uncertainty/error/resolution in space, time and other 
measurable quantities.

Regards,
Frans


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer 
<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
------------------------------------------------------------------------