- From: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:18:44 +0200
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, public-gdw-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <53B2A724.9000302@geodan.nl>
Hello Phil, Thank you for the explanation. It seems there will enough room for maneuvering in the working group. I would love to be in. I have just asked my bosses for permission to make the commitment described in section 6. Greetings, Frans On 2014-06-27 17:42, Phil Archer wrote: > Hi Frans, > > The UCR is really about documenting the ground trust on which the rest > of the WG's work should be based. In effect it creates a more detailed > version of the charter. If we find that use cases demand extra > deliverables then we invoke the final sentence of that section: > "Subject to its capacity, the working group may choose to develop > additional relevant vocabularies and specifications in response to > community demand. For example: a standard method for converting > between spatial ontologies; methods to access a subset of a large > dataset in terms of its spatial component." > > If one is not needed, or the WG doesn't have the capacity to deliver > it, then it asks for forgiveness... > > A charter is about setting expectations and the broad scope of the > WG's work. The UCR provides the detail. > > And you know my next question - are you in? > > Phil. > > On 27/06/2014 15:22, Frans Knibbe | Geodan wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a question about the deliverables listed in the charter (section >> 4 <http://www.w3.org/2014/05/geo-charter#deliverables>). The first >> deliverable is 'use cases and requirements', a list of problems that the >> working group is trying to solve. What could be the relationship with >> the other deliverables, which essentially already is a list a problems >> that should be solved? What if the first deliverable identifies new >> topics that are not listed as a deliverable yet? Or what if it follows >> from the first deliverable that one of the others really is not a very >> pressing issue? >> >> Could the deliverables be set apart, the first one being a thing that >> needs to be done under all circumstances and the others as candidates >> for further work, leaving open the option that other candidates might be >> discovered? >> >> Greetings, >> Frans >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Frans Knibbe >> Geodan >> President Kennedylaan 1 >> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) >> >> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 >> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl >> www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer >> <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 12:19:20 UTC