- From: Thejas Prasad <thejchess@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:29:46 -0500
- To: Niklas Petersen <petersen@cs.uni-bonn.de>
- Cc: Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>, public-gao@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADZj_OHsKbKtAqYi7UwRG=nD9wdCamYqK1=FfEekX6wA=UCY_A@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Niklas, Why would you want to combine both the ontologies? Thanks, Thejas On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:52 PM Niklas Petersen <petersen@cs.uni-bonn.de> wrote: > Hi Thejas, > > he meant that you should use both, the auto ontologies and the > GoogRelations and schema.org ontology together. > > If you do not have too much experience in building ontologies, I would > recommend to do first a tutorial to learn the basics concepts. The > University of Manchester has a nice tutorial with the ontology editor > Protege: > > > http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/publications/talks-and-tutorials/protg-owl-tutorial/ > > Download the v1.3 PDF and take an afternoon to do it step-by-step. > > > I would not recommend to start building an ontology without having learned > the basics. It will be a painful experience and the result will probably be > useless. > > > Best regards, > Niklas > > > On 27.03.19 5:22 nachm., Thejas Prasad wrote: > > Cool, thanks guys! > > I am very new into the area of ontology @martin, what do you mean by using > auto ontology in conjunction? > 1. Is there any documentation on how to use ontologies in general? > 2. Is there a user group/ slack or IRC on general usage of ontologies? > > Thanks, > Thejas > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 6:28 AM Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all: >> >> The official answer is that the auto ontology is to be used in >> conjunction with GoodRelations or schema.org (which includes >> GoodRelations) for all aspects of offering vehicles or associated services. >> The VSO complements GoodRelations for some auto-related aspects. >> >> See >> >> http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/ >> >> BTW, the GAO was mostly imported into schema.org, so you can use the >> concepts directly from schema.org. >> >> See >> >> https://schema.org/docs/automotive.html >> >> A bit of background: >> >> >> https://www.dataversity.net/new-schema-org-extension-proposal-automotive-industry/ >> https://auto.schema.org/ >> >> >> Best wishes >> Martin Hepp >> >> >> >> > On 26. Mar 2019, at 12:22, Niklas Petersen <petersen@cs.uni-bonn.de> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Thejas, >> > >> > I assume you know about the Volkswagen Sales Ontology? >> > http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/vso/ns >> > >> > Maybe MobiVoc also interesting for you: >> > >> > http://schema.mobivoc.org/ >> > >> > Last week, I stumbled btw upon the Mobility Data Specification by the >> City of Los Angeles (json-based): >> > https://github.com/CityOfLosAngeles/mobility-data-specification >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Niklas >> > >> > >> > >> > On 21.03.19 8:58 nachm., Thejas Prasad wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I was wondering if there were any automotive ontologies that captures >> delearships (sale {purchase, used, lease}, service -- {repair, oil >> change,...}, .. } >> >> >> >> thanks, >> >> Thejas >> > >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2019 20:33:34 UTC