- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:57:33 +0100
- To: sopekmir@makolab.pl
- Cc: public-gao@w3.org
On 1 October 2015 at 08:54, Mirek Sopek <sopekmir@makolab.pl> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > Apologies for the delay in following up. We are now a bit behind our initial > plans but would like to take this opportunity to trigger the critical review > of the classes and properties in the published auto.schema.org extension. > > > > We will send more details on the review process later this week with > intention to come back to the normal activity of the group. I will also > update our work plan to reflect the reality, it will only be moved by one > month forward. > > > > The first action for which we will call you very soon is the critical review > of classes and properties in the published auto.schema.org extension. The > plan has already been initially developed on our side in September, but we > need to review it. We will most surely propose the second Teleconference for > the Community in October to summarize the review process. > > > > Finally, I’m happy to welcome all new members of our Community that joined > the Group since our last welcome message: > > > > · Kevin Heberle > > · Niklas Petersen (University of Bonn) > > · Robert Bertholf > > · Joel Peters > > · Lihua Zhao > > > > If I missed someone, please forgive me. All are very warmly welcomed. Thanks for the update. Quick question: are there any immediate obvious fixes/tweaks needed on the currently published auto.schema.org terms, i.e. changes that would be candidates for inclusion in the next release? Dan > > > Cheers > > Mirek > > > >
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 07:58:07 UTC