- From: Paul Bakaus <pbakaus@zynga.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:24:58 +0000
- To: Erik Möller <emoller@opera.com>, Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>, Boaz Sender <boaz@bocoup.com>
- CC: "public-games@w3.org" <public-games@w3.org>
Hi everybody, Meta viewport and orientation lock are entirely separate feature sets. Orientation lock is very much needed, and I have good news: It has been added to the WebApps charter: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/CharterChanges (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/screen-orientation/raw-file/tip/Overview.html). I don't think people agree on the API yet, but at least, everybody agrees it's needed. BTW - working with the meta viewport, by all means, is not easy. I needed to abstract the whole thing so people could make sense out of it (see https://github.com/zynga/viewporter). Cheers, Paul Am 15.02.12 09:19 schrieb "Erik Möller" unter <emoller@opera.com>: >On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:16:45 +0100, Boaz Sender <boaz@bocoup.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/09/games/#orientation called for a way to lock >>> the >>> layout orientation on devices such as phones that can be rotated and >>> would >>> normally re-flow the page. >> >> >> You should note, we did not confirm the API suggestion at our second >> event: >> >>https://docs.google.com/a/bocoup.com/document/pub?id=1fs1hpZvP05ViEWtaLSm >>NQUV_PW2jCWS5Oe2GAdBKgl0#h.qqs7z5r08h55 >> >> We merely said we wanted a mechanism for locking the default >> rotate/reflow behavior. >> >> >>> Is this still needed? Is it addressed by the viewport meta tag? >>> >>> >>>https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Mobile/Using_the_viewport_meta_tag_to_i >>>mprove_the_mobile_browsing_experience >>> >>> >>> (I'm looking to update the chrome bug >>> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=90413) >>> >> >> It seems like the viewport tag has stabilized, and the common rhetoric >> seems to be, add it, and the scripters will build libs on it, and then >> when >> we know what we like, it will get specified. I can live with that. >> >> At the same time a JavaScript interface would be nice. >> document.querySelector("meta[name=viewport]") is lame. >> >> Some consistency with >> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/API/Mouse_Lock_API(I'm assuming the >> MDN docs match chrome's implementation which I haven't >> looked at yet). >> >> Also, Vincent and Dmose, way to kick off 2012 with some AWESOME >>movement >> on >> the games group wish list. Please accept our high virtual fives, and >>send >> them to your colleagues. You all rock! >> > >I agree viewport meta is looking pretty good, but I presume you could >still want to lock the orientation for layout reasons? >Of course, orientation lock would also be a requirement to do anything >usable with accelerometers. > >-- >Erik Möller >Core Developer >Opera Software >twitter.com/erikjmoller >
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 09:25:30 UTC