Re: Scope Proposal

lgtm too

On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:26:55 -0800, Tom Wiltzius <wiltzius@google.com>  
wrote:

> Ditto.
>
> On Thursday, November 10, 2011, Vincent Scheib wrote:
>
>> Still looks good to me.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Erik Möller  
>> <emoller@opera.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'emoller@opera.com');>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:20:39 +0100, Boaz Sender  
>>> <boaz@bocoup.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'boaz@bocoup.com');>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I've tried to synthesize everyone's suggestions in this charter:
>>>>
>>>> """
>>>> The goal of the games community group is to improve the quality of  
>>>> open
>>>> web
>>>> standards that game developers rely on to create games. This is done  
>>>> by:
>>>>  * Tracking specifications and vendor implementations related to open  
>>>> web
>>>> games.
>>>>  * Recommending new specifications to be produced and finding working
>>>> group homes for them.
>>>>  * Refining use cases to communicate specific needs of games.
>>>>  * Evangelizing specifications to browser vendors.
>>>>  * Documenting how to best use open web standards for games
>>>>  * Evangelizing open web standards to game developers and game
>>>> development
>>>> best practices to web developers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The games community group will not develop any specifications, and  
>>>> thus,
>>>> there will not be any Essential Claims under the W3C Contributor  
>>>> License
>>>> Agreement or Final Specification Agreement.
>>>> """
>>>>
>>>> Any last words before we publish it tomorrow?
>>>>
>>>> -Boaz
>>>>
>>>
>>> I support this charter. Like Charles said with regards to mobile and
>>> other platforms (in a way you guys should be familiar with by now)  
>>> "Opera
>>> cares!".
>>>
>>> --
>>> Erik Möller
>>> Core Developer
>>> Opera Software
>>> twitter.com/erikjmoller
>>>
>>>

Received on Sunday, 13 November 2011 20:39:57 UTC