I agree with Marco's definition. About Andrew question, if we use the term 'quality' we should define what quality means. In the other hand, we can also be more general and say:
"The goal of the games community group is to improve open web standards that game developers rely on to create games."
Ra.
Tecnalia Blackberry Service
De: Andrew Baker [mailto:andrew_j_baker2@hotmail.com]
Enviado: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 04:12 PM
Para: w3c@marcosc.com <w3c@marcosc.com>; gmthundercat@gmail.com <gmthundercat@gmail.com>
CC: public-games@w3.org <public-games@w3.org>; scheib@google.com <scheib@google.com>; boaz@bocoup.com <boaz@bocoup.com>
Asunto: RE: Scope Proposal
Are we interested in quality? Or suitability? Or both?
> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:10:47 +0100
> From: w3c@marcosc.com
> To: gmthundercat@gmail.com
> CC: public-games@w3.org; scheib@google.com; boaz@bocoup.com
> Subject: Re: Scope Proposal
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 8, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Ben Adams wrote:
>
> > > > The goal of the games community group is to improve the quality of games the can be built using open web standards. This is done by:
> > >
> >
>
> I don't think this is accurate: we don't improve the quality of games, only game developers can do that.
>
> It should read:
>
> The goal of the games community group is to improve the quality of open web standards that game developers rely on to create games.
>
>
>
>