- From: Luke Warlow via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2025 10:32:56 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
> They don't directly relate to the DOM object itself, or manipulation of it, as the props and methods for all other Geometry nodes do; they relate to the object's relationship with the environment/other DOM objects, so belong at a higher level. I'd be curious to hear more on this. A DOMRect doesn't really have any inherent relationship with the DOM from what I understand. It's a primitive to hold data about a rectangle? Not having utilities to common comparisons and operations on the primitive feels like an ommission to me? My understanding is the DOM prefix of the name is more of a historical anomaly / compat? I'd be interested to know if that's a wrong assumption and there is something more intrinsic? -- GitHub Notification of comment by lukewarlow Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/602#issuecomment-3038721188 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 5 July 2025 10:32:57 UTC