- From: Said Abou-Hallawa via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 16:58:28 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
shallawa has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts:
== [filter-effects-1] Elements with invalid filters ==
In https://drafts.fxtf.org/filter-effects/#FilterProperty, it is not clear what should happen if an invalid filter is applied to an element.
1. Should the element be rendered without any filter?
2. Should the rendering of the element be omitted entirely?
3. Should the invalid filter be corrected so the element with a valid filter be displayed?
The browsers disagree in displaying this test case:
```
<style>
svg {
border: 1px red solid;
width: 400px;
height: 300px;
}
.box {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
background-color: green;
margin: 20px;
}
.filtered-1 {
filter: drop-shadow(10px 10px -4px #4444dd);
}
.filtered-2 {
filter: url(#shadow);
}
</style>
<body>
<p>A div element with invalid CSS filter:</p>
<div class="box filtered-1"></div>
<p>A div element with invalid referenced SVG filter:</p>
<div class="box filtered-2"></div>
<p>A rect element with invalid SVG filter:</p>
<svg>
<filter id="shadow">
<feDropShadow dx="10" dy="10" stdDeviation="-4" flood-color="#4444dd" />
</filter>
<rect width="200" height="200" style="fill:green; filter:url(#shadow);" />
</svg>
</body>
```
1. Safari does not display any SVG element with invalid SVG filter
2. Chrome seems to correct the SVG filter and is able to display any element that references this SVG filter
3. FireFox does no display any element with invalid SVG filters
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/564 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2024 16:58:29 UTC