- From: Boris Chiou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 04:28:31 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Yeah! The syntax you provided, ``` <'offset-path'> [ <'offset-distance'> || <'offset-rotate'> ]? [ / [ <'offset-anchor'> || <'offset-position'> ]? ``` look much better than the original one because `offset-position` is ignored if we don't have an valid `offset-path`. The design idea of the current shorthand syntax is because `offset-position` may create a stacking context, and it could be used independently. However, we change its meaning in 2023 but we probably forgot to change the shorthand at the same time. -- GitHub Notification of comment by BorisChiou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/515#issuecomment-1882394846 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2024 04:28:33 UTC