- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 19:09:55 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
I cannot find the issue/PR but I think this was already explained to me, sorry. But you cannot know at parse time which of `<mask-source>` or `<image>` the resource is matching, isn't it? I understand the usefulness of `<mask-source>` to differentiate them in other sections of the specification. But from the perspective of parsing, there is none and it is a bit problematic for a grammar-driven implementation: one of the two types will never get a match. Would it be acceptable to define the two appropriate terms without using the syntax? -- GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/532#issuecomment-1726329404 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2023 19:09:58 UTC