- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:16:14 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
cdoublev has just submitted a new pull request for https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts:
== [css-masking-1] Allow permutation in mask-border-slice ==
I think `&&` was lost in [this commit](https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/commit/7af5acb2b6d290a3fa9508cf76af05b772057b23#diff-aacf1a334bd4ec16c705bf164f6bc873cbaee4b25944da51f00184c321b84562L1167-L1171).
> **Name:** `mask-border-slice`
> **Value:** `[ <number> | <percentage> ]{1,4} fill?`
>
> See the `border-image-slice` property [CSS3BG] for the definitions of the property values.
https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#propdef-mask-border-slice
> **Name:** `border-image-slice`
> **Value:** `[<number [0,∞]> | <percentage [0,∞]>]{1,4} && fill?`
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#propdef-border-image-slice
---
The following longhand pairs also have different initial values, different animation types, and numeric CSS types are constrained for one but not the other:
- [`border-image-slice`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#propdef-border-image-slice) and [`mask-border-slice`](https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#propdef-mask-border-slice)
- [`border-image-width`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#propdef-border-image-width) and [`mask-border-width`](https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#propdef-mask-border-width)
- [`border-image-outset`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#propdef-border-image-outset) and [`mask-border-outset`](https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#propdef-mask-border-outset)
I am not sure (all) these differences are intentional.
See https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/pull/530
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2023 12:16:17 UTC