Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking-1] Interpolation of mask-border properties (#529)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-masking-1] Interpolation of mask-border properties`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: mask-border properties will match border-image wrt animatability`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;lea> 2nd Straw poll posted!<br>
&lt;fantasai> ntim: The properties are marked as discretely animatable, but that's inconsistent with border-image which is animatable by computed style<br>
&lt;fantasai> ntim: I know mask-border was based off border-image, so I was wondering why the inconsistency?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> +1 to matching border-image<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: I suspect (haven't checked) is that animatable lines weren't added in the source, and Bikeshed defaults them to discrete<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: But yes it makes sense to make them consistent<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> (I could just make it an error at this point; that didn't make sense before.)<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: Proposed to change mask border properties to match border-image<br>
&lt;fantasai> RESOLVED: mask-border properties will match border-image wrt animatability<br>

GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2023 23:52:49 UTC