- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 00:01:50 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Okay, I've made some Editorial Decisions here. * The element being referenced by coord-box is the element establishing the containing block for the transformed element. We can't rely on parent element, as if the parent is, say, an inline, it doesn't have a reasonable box to look at. And when the transformed element is abspos, this'll be the abspos containing block, which is definitely what we want for the common ray() case. * When used in an SVG context, I just treat all instances of coord-box as being `view-box`. SVG doesn't have a useful notion of "parent" or "containing block" here; "nearest viewport" is the closest thing that makes sense, and the `view-box` keyword does the job there without requiring me to invent anything new. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/369#issuecomment-1457239856 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2023 00:01:52 UTC