- From: Isaac Nygaard via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:21:40 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Azmisov has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts: == [css-masking-1] Add a "fill" option for mask-repeat == When you are using `mask-composite` with `mask-repeat=no-repeat`, the area outside the mask bounds (as given by `mask-size`) is treated as transparent. In certain cases, I would have liked the option to treat the outside area as opaque instead. E.g. I want to use an "inverse" of a mask (all alpha inverted) as one of the layers, but for it to work, all area outside the mask-size should have been inverted. I've run into a few cases where I've needed to use 1-2 extra full-size masks to mimic the effect. My proposal would be to add a `fill` option to `mask-repeat`, which behaves like `no-repeat` except filling the outside area with 100% opacity instead of 0% opacity. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/489 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2023 21:21:41 UTC