Re: [fxtf-drafts] [motion-1] Incorrect type definition link in <size> (#411)

I also don't know whether there is a clear note about name conflicts somewhere but there are already some conflicting definitions like for the `path()` function in [Motion 1](https://drafts.fxtf.org/motion-1/#offsetpath-pathfunc) vs. [Shapes 1](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-1/#funcdef-path) or the `element()` function (see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1981). (But function names are also different because they are exposed to authors in opposite to other data types.)

Disregarding the name conflict, the syntax inside the `ray()` function obviously means the definition of `<size>` in that specification and not the one of CSS Images 3.

The question here is, can and should both definitions be merged into one?

In any case, the linking should be fixed for now, so I'll create a PR for that.

Sebastian

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/411#issuecomment-727040392 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 13 November 2020 21:18:35 UTC