W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fxtf-archive@w3.org > March 2020

Re: [fxtf-drafts] [motion] CSS and SVG box correspondence seems overly-simplistic (#66)

From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 23:57:01 +0000
To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-594947519-1583366220-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I agree that it makes sense to define these in a single place & the box model spec makes as much sense as any.

With respect to the definition text:

- The phrases “SVG context” and “CSS context” should be defined.

- It's important to note that some elements (`<svg>` and `<foreignObject>`) can have both SVG and CSS contexts associated with them, for the internal vs external layout systems.  So the fallbacks should be worded as “if this element doesn't have a [CSS|SVG] layout context, use this fallback”.

GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/66#issuecomment-594947519 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2020 23:57:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 4 March 2020 23:57:04 UTC