Re: [fxtf-drafts] [motion-1] The definition of "containing box" for ray() function (#369)

I see. Thanks for these suggestions. My preference is the 2nd option:
> Alternately, we could say that ray paths refer to the reference box of the parent element, and <geometry-box> similarly refers to a box of the parent element.

IMO, It seems this is easier to understand because containing block is sometimes too complicated for users. Besides, using the `reference box` (e.g. from `transform-box` property) of the parent element should also be easy for developers for both CSS and SVG layout.

@heycam and I had a quick disscussion about this issue. @heycam, do you have any prefernece or feedback for this? Thanks.

GitHub Notification of comment by BorisChiou
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2019 21:50:49 UTC