W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fxtf-archive@w3.org > June 2019

Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix constructor is a performance and code portability footgun (#346)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 19:03:42 +0000
To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-506844744-1561748621-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Yeah, I think it makes sense, and solves bz's very reasonable use-case.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/346#issuecomment-506844744 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 28 June 2019 19:03:44 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub: "Re: [fxtf-drafts] Don't distinguish between unspecified and empty DomQuadInit fields (#353)"
Previous message: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub: "Re: [fxtf-drafts] Don't distinguish between unspecified and empty DomQuadInit fields (#353)"
In reply to: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub: "[fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix constructor is a performance and code portability footgun (#346)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 28 June 2019 19:03:45 UTC