Re: [fxtf-drafts] Fix the backdrop-filter order of operations to get opacity right (#361)

@mstange I see the point you're making here, that in some cases it's confusing that a partial region of your element that is fully-opaque shows through the backdrop-filtered effect when opacity is applied. However, I would submit that the more common case, which would also cause confusion if this were implemented the other way, is for the *entire* background to be an opaque color, with opacity<1 applied to "see through" it to the filtered backdrop. In that case, people will not be able to see any of the backdrop-filtered content. Seems like the lesser of two evils. The core issue is that the backdrop-filtered content lives somewhere in between the element and the backdrop.

@cbrewster Thanks for the comments. I'll see what I can do about clarifying the order of transform, effect, clip. If you have particular suggestions for that, let me know!

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mfreed7
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/pull/361#issuecomment-516095149 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 29 July 2019 17:52:06 UTC